Skip to main content
Check and provide your planning data

BETA This is a new service – your feedback will help us to improve it.

Back to dataset table
East Hampshire District Council

Tree

There is a problem

  • 1000 entries with tree-preservation-order field must match the reference field in the tree preservation order

1349

reference
934-tree-1
name
1349
tree-preservation-order

undefined

934-tpo-1
uprn
address-text
point
POINT (-1.032674 50.877070)
geometry
MULTIPOLYGON (((-1.032589 50.877061,-1.032593 50.877077,-1.032604 50.877092,-1.032623 50.877105,-1.032647 50.877112,-1.032673 50.877115,-1.032699 50.877113,-1.032723 50.877105,-1.032742 50.877094,-1.032755 50.877079,-1.032759 50.877062,-1.032756 50.877045,-1.032744 50.877030,-1.032725 50.877018,-1.032701 50.877010,-1.032675 50.877007,-1.032649 50.877010,-1.032625 50.877017,-1.032606 50.877029,-1.032593 50.877044,-1.032589 50.877061)))
notes
felled-date
entry-date
2026-08-06
start-date
end-date

How to fix this issue

Your data is missing a tree-preservation-order.

The tree guidance explains how to fix the issue:

tree-preservation-order

The reference for the tree preservation order that affects this tree.

Example: TPO1

This diagram shows the relationship between the tree preservation order dataset and the tree dataset. The reference value from your tree preservation order dataset needs to match the tree-preservation-order value in your tree dataset.

How to improve East Hampshire District Council’s data

  1. Fix the errors indicated
  2. Use the check service to make sure the data meets the standard
  3. Publish the updated data on the endpoint URL